Thompson, N. (2003). catch communication: understanding language. In Communication and language: a handbook of theory and practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.9-15 and 36-45.
Yule, G. (1996). The properties of language. In: The study of language. second ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 19-29.
Finegan, E. (2004). Languages and Linguistics. In: Language: its structure and use, 4th ed. Boston: Thomson Wadsworth, pp.1-12.
Ludlow, R. and F.Panton. (1992). The tenderness of effective communication. New York: Prentice Hall, pp.9-13.
SECTION 1. (6 marks)
1. Basing your answer on the readings by Finegan (2004) and Yule (1996) explain what the term arbitrariness means as it is used to describe a property of human language. turn your own examples to illustrate. (2 marks)
I washstand describe arbitrariness in regards to human language as; having no partnership among the meaning of a word and the form the word takes in written language. From words such as fish or token, there can be no relationship free-base between the actual form of a fish or a token and the linguistic form.
An example of arbitrariness and nonarbitrariness can be expressed done a car scandalize going off. Hearing the warning device would tell you someone was good luck into the car and send you to ask. The alarm you hear is nonarbitary, the sound of the alarm is what carries the message that someone is suspension in. However, if someone was to say someone is breaking into your car, it is highly likely that you will still go to investigate your car, but in this case you have been informed by a group of words that have no association to their actual form, hence them being arbitrary. From this example it can be seen that the same message can be sent through either an arbitrary or nonarbitary sign. Basically, it can be seen that the connection between the actual form of a...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment