Report on Two Software Programs with Business Application

Recommendation Report In this report, you atomic number 18 going to find twain softw ar computer course of studys with business applications and compare them fit to four well-defined criteria. You go away then recommend one program over another on the basis of your relation. Your report get out be written to me assume Im your boss, we work together in a small company, and Ive asked you to find the best program for our purposes. The selection of programs is up to you, but you must choose two programs that do near the same thing. Dont choose a tax program and a spreadsheet, for example.You then need to think of the criteria you are going to drug ab purpose to make the proportion. Your choice of criteria is very important. This forms the basis for your comparison if you dont choose concrete, specific, and relevant criteria that allow you to make a detailed comparison of the two programs, your comparison is not going to be informative or meaningful. Also, one of the criteria you choose must be the cost of the program. This will, obviously, be a very simple point of comparison. Your recommendation report will get hold of three members The Introduction will give a short gateway to the two programs youve elect to discuss tell us the name of the software, who manufactures it, and so on You are also going to inform me as to the criteria you choose to use to make the comparison, and why you choose those criteria. The Findings department will compare the two programs according to cost and the three other criteria youve chosen. The format you choose for this section is up to you, but the comparison should be easy to process visually. This will be the longest section of your report. The Recommendation In this section you will describe why one of the programs you have discussed in the Findings section is punter than the other one. You need to make clear reference to what youve discovered in the Findings section in order to fully justify your recommenda tion. Unsatisfactory demand Work Satisfactory Exemplary Mark Introduction Introduction transfer, or one component absent or completely inadequate. Outline of programs in addition general. Introduction of four criteria lacks specifics, no justification. -Clear and laconic outline of two programs-Clear, short introduction of four criteria. Clear, concise and detailed outline of two programs-Clear, concise and detailed introduction of four criteria. /10 Findings -Many details absent or vague. -Criteria make meaningful comparison impossible. -Document is a mess. -Details are clearly absent or vague. -Criteria are flawed in some way which renders the comparison somewhat ineffective. -Organization detracts from ease of visual processing, replicate form mistakes. Programs compared with a just amount of detail. Criteria relatively well-chosen. Organization does not interfere with visual processing, parallel form used. Programs compared fully according to cost and three other criteria. -Criteria are well-chosen and work to fully illuminate the two programs. -Organization allows for ease of visual processing, parallel form used. /25 Recommenda-tion Reasons not clear or detailed, section too short. Gives general, somewhat vague reasons why one program was chosen and the other was not. Gives clear and detailed reasons why one program was chosen and the other was not. Gives specific, clear and detailed reasons why one program was chosen and the other was not. /10 Grammar and Style Errors, major and minor, pervasive. Subheadings not used. Two or three major errors. More than five minor errors. Subheadings used. - iodine or two major errors. Three to five minor errors. Subheadings used. No major errors. One or two minor errors. Subheadings used. /15