Picaro the "hero" of Picaresque and The novel of Chivalry

However, Lazarillo was not as preoccupied as he sounded. Through various cunning acts, he managed to steal "good large pieces of bacon and sausage" and money from the stratagem man. In his mind, he justified his actions with this line: "that's how I apply to make him pay for the way he treated me" (29; ch. 1). Essentially, he became as deceptive as his pilot. Even though he was quick to approximate their behavior, he was not willing to audit his own actions critically. For example, when he stole the sausage off the cunning's man's cooking pan and replaced it with a turnip, his master almost killed him. However, Lazarillo described the incident as though he were truly innocent: "I swore projection screen I had nothing to do with it, but it was no use. I couldn't hide anything from that evil old man" (34; ch. 1).

The way Lazarillo odd the old man also testified to his own brutality. Knowing that the blind man was dep remnantent on him for his vision, Lazarillo deceived the blind man into bound into a pillar and left the blind man in an unconscious state (37; ch. 1).

However, it is important to note that Lazarillo only acted r veritable(a)gefully towards his masters who ill-treated him. When he was with the impoverished gentleman, Lazarillo took on the duty of begging for food and taking care of his poor master. In fact, Lazarillo felt "sorry" for him and would even starve to ensure that his master ate something (58; ch. 3). This spectacular change of behavior can be attributed to the fact that this new mas

In fact, Lazarillo's masters were true picaresque characters who moved from town to town, exploitation tricks to deceive the people. His fifth master who sold papal indulgences for certain embodied the essence of a picaresque character who had no qualms about deceiving people to get his money. He contrived unlike tricks, including conspiring with the local town police constable in a dramatic scam to trick the townspeople into believing the power of his indulgences. later the incident, the master simply laughed over the clever plan with the constable (72; ch. 5).

In spite of the differences between the characters, Rincon shared Lazarillo's tendency to judge other people's morality without looking at their own.

In their talk with the student, Rincon declared that the priest would be doomed for losing the holy money. harmonise to Rincon, the priest was a terrible sinner for deceiving money from the worshippers. Therefore, in Rincon's world of morality, the priest was a greater sinner than Cortado and him (De Cervantes 93). Towards the end of the story, Rincon provided a perceptive view of the Monipodio's academy of thieves and thugs. Although Monipodio and his followers attached all kinds of crimes, they continued to worship God and considered themselves pious devotees. Ironically, even though Rincon indulged in the lifestyle of the thieves, he was "shocked by the slackness of the law in that famous city of Seville, where such(prenominal) pernicious and perverted people could live almost openly" (De Cervantes 119). Like Lazarillo, his blindness towards his own character allowed him to make raise judgments about his associates without including himself. Therefore, the picaresque heroes of these two novels did not grow in their understanding about their identities by the end of the book. While Lazarillo hid his inhering self within the trappings of respectability, Rincon exempted his lack of morality by condemning the hypocrisy of people around him.

Unlike Lazarillo who co
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!